Get Global Supremacy Now!

Acquisition limit needs to Be changed!!!!!

• ☠Ð℞.Ɗعᵃﾅℌ☠➫ϻϮღ➬ Jan 12, 2014

  The limit should be by each player attacking the person and not by the player being attacked totals 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
• ☠Ð℞.Ɗعᵃﾅℌ☠➫ϻϮღ➬ Jan 12, 2014

  Lets get this fixed and start the wars!!!!!!!!!!
• 🌟 ℕᎾℛᏆℋ💫ЅᏆᎯℛ 🌟 Jan 12, 2014

  I don't quite get it, what exactly are you proposing? Be a little clearer in explanation. is this about wars?
• RARE Feb 8, 2014

  He's saying someone with 900 extra bases can't cap someone wot 32/29 bases because they are over limit. Basically if you are over limit nobody can cap you and that's bull
• Strykr X Apr 15, 2014

  Is this accurate...that you can't capture any bases from a player who currently has '(n+1)' out of maximum 'n' bases?

  Does that then imply it's virtually impossible to reduce a player to zero bases through capture, since once they fall below the base maximum they can just plop down as many bases as needed until they're over max again, and thus uncapturable? (I am assuming the defender is active and has the cash to rebuild the bases immediately, not counting base structures.)
• Tea Sipper Apr 20, 2014

  I was about 8 bases over max and got some taken off me.
• ΒΟSS May 15, 2014

  RARE wrote:

  He's saying someone with 900 extra bases can't cap someone wot 32/29 bases because they are over limit. Basically if you are over limit nobody can cap you and that's bull

  That's not what he is saying. He is saying the "acquisition limit" of a player should be based on the number of times you have acquired a base from them and not the total number of bases that were taken in total from that player by other players.
• ℬɪŧʗҥȃяƌ➫ϻϮღ➬ Jun 13, 2014

  This game sucks. Boom! That's it! Waste of time
• Psych Jun 14, 2014

  Then why do you play it?