GS: Win or Fail?
Forums › General Discussion › GS: Win or Fail?-
At first i really liked the game, but now, it seems to really lack. Im on the bridge with this one. Not as good as TW IMO
-
I took a break from TW but im gonna get back to it tomorrow, im still playing this, but am gonna dedicate more time to TW. This game seems to be a money grab for a few reasons.
-
In your opinion, in my opinion a far superior game that's going to require a lot more tactical thinking.
-
💖Swagger💖 wrote:
Dont get me wrong, its a good game, but i don't think it met the bar TW set.In your opinion, in my opinion a far superior game that's going to require a lot more tactical thinking.
-
Good = GPS based, no airports, better interface (room for improvement), no taxing, no punching codes as a barrier to playing in a busy area, sexy colored maps
Bad = Bit buggy at the moment (but will improve), hopping needs to be made easier, C4 could prove to be an atomic weapon
-
I am quite enjoying this game. I don't think it is a money grabbing game - it seems to me you can be quite successful without putting money in
-
All this really needs is more player. The other stuff can be tweaked. Maybe we can do a recruiting drive?
-
This game seems no different to tw, i like it, but it seems to have a lot of pitfalls. It's a huge money grab if you want to keep up with everyone you'll have to spend, without spending its too slow, you can't control your buildings. I have millions in cash and nothing I can spend it on. Weird game
-
Mr Pussy wrote:
Hopping not existing is also badGood = GPS based, no airports, better interface (room for improvement), no taxing, no punching codes as a barrier to playing in a busy area, sexy colored maps
Bad = Bit buggy at the moment (but will improve), hopping needs to be made easier, C4 could prove to be an atomic weapon
-
Glad I got in early. But seems to require money or time more than TW
-
piratecopy wrote:
I disagree.This game seems no different to tw, i like it, but it seems to have a lot of pitfalls. It's a huge money grab if you want to keep up with everyone you'll have to spend, without spending its too slow, you can't control your buildings. I have millions in cash and nothing I can spend it on. Weird game
-
And in what way do you disagree?
-
Why are people deciding how this game plays after 3 days. Give it's few updates b4 you decide
-
💖Swagger💖 wrote:
I agree. 👍In your opinion, in my opinion a far superior game that's going to require a lot more tactical thinking.
-
I think it's far too early to say at the mo, we don't know how the game will work with new updates for syndicate fighting etc.People compare to TW but TW has been going over 3 years with thousands of players so has had time to evolve.this game hasn't. There are a few issues with it but hopefully these will be addressed and it will end up a decent game
-
Love it, the GPS and zones are well presented and will a decent update to sort out the roads (because it keeps saying there isn't a road when I'm clearly tapping on it) then it will be perfect
-
fun6754 wrote:
Mr Pussy wrote:
Hopping not existing is also badGood = GPS based, no airports, better interface (room for improvement), no taxing, no punching codes as a barrier to playing in a busy area, sexy colored maps
Bad = Bit buggy at the moment (but will improve), hopping needs to be made easier, C4 could prove to be an atomic weapon
I like no hopping, if you want hopping play TW. Stop trying to turn this in TW. Just go back there and quit bitching.
If you want a real GPS game play GS. I pray this isn't changed at some point. Please no airports either.
-
Reaper💀 wrote:
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏💖Swagger💖 wrote:
I agree. 👍In your opinion, in my opinion a far superior game that's going to require a lot more tactical thinking.
-
Reaper💀 wrote:
💖Swagger💖 wrote:
I agree. 👍In your opinion, in my opinion a far superior game that's going to require a lot more tactical thinking.
-
SlickRick wrote:
Exactly, don't turn this into TW just because you're uncomfortable with it.fun6754 wrote:
Mr Pussy wrote:
Hopping not existing is also badGood = GPS based, no airports, better interface (room for improvement), no taxing, no punching codes as a barrier to playing in a busy area, sexy colored maps
Bad = Bit buggy at the moment (but will improve), hopping needs to be made easier, C4 could prove to be an atomic weapon
I like no hopping, if you want hopping play TW. Stop trying to turn this in TW. Just go back there and quit bitching.
If you want a real GPS game play GS. I pray this isn't changed at some point. Please no airports either.
-
I don't fully know what this game is, yet. Still lots to be unlocked/turned on.
-
Awesome game even with the bugs that come with the launch of any game and the room for improvement in some places.
-
There is hopping. We hopped from the San Francisco to Oakland and beyond in the beta.
I've hopped a few miles in my town. It's just a lot slower
-
I'm just not feelin it like the way I did turf wars
-
I think this is better than turf wars by a landslide. Please check out my post in the suggestions forum too please.
-
SlickRick wrote:
Please in the name of Nick, keep it airport free, GPS .fun6754 wrote:
Mr Pussy wrote:
Hopping not existing is also badGood = GPS based, no airports, better interface (room for improvement), no taxing, no punching codes as a barrier to playing in a busy area, sexy colored maps
Bad = Bit buggy at the moment (but will improve), hopping needs to be made easier, C4 could prove to be an atomic weapon
I like no hopping, if you want hopping play TW. Stop trying to turn this in TW. Just go back there and quit bitching.
If you want a real GPS game play GS. I pray this isn't changed at some point. Please no airports either.
![[][]](https://www.globalsupremacyapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC