Get Global Supremacy Now!

Global Supremacy NEEDS more fighting!

• Mr. Baltimore Aug 25, 2013

  Although Turf Wars received many complaints for its War-friendly environment, I believe that game remains popular due to the fact that its constantly active with War. Please Nick, I'm beggin ya, open the door to more War!
• EastCoastKing Aug 25, 2013

  We need nukes and tanks and UFO side gunners. And I want hordes of orcs with lightsabers
• ★ Ꮯapokiller ★ Aug 26, 2013

  EastCoastKing wrote:

  We need nukes and tanks and UFO side gunners. And I want hordes of orcs with lightsabers

  Lol
• Mr. Baltimore Aug 26, 2013

  ★ Ꮯapokiller ★ wrote:

  EastCoastKing wrote:

  We need nukes and tanks and UFO side gunners. And I want hordes of orcs with lightsabers

  Lol

  #Genius
• ᑔΛ͒łLΞYᑔUB Aug 27, 2013

  I'm sure the taser would be stronger than the tank still. What a dumb weapon to be stronger than all those badass machine guns : /
• EastCoastKing Aug 27, 2013

  daileydub wrote:

  I'm sure the taser would be stronger than the tank still. What a dumb weapon to be stronger than all those badass machine guns : /

  So true
• EastCoastKing Aug 27, 2013

  Any realistic melee wepon being better then a rifle/shotgun is messed up for that matter lol
• ♠♚ЦℕƊƩ₣ᏐℕƩƊ♚♠ Aug 27, 2013

  Mr. Baltimore wrote:

  Although Turf Wars received many complaints for its War-friendly environment, I believe that game remains popular due to the fact that its constantly active with War. Please Nick, I'm beggin ya, open the door to more War!

  In what ways are you thinking?
• Mr. Baltimore Aug 28, 2013

  ♠♚ЦℕƊƩ₣ᏐℕƩƊ♚♠ wrote:

  Mr. Baltimore wrote:

  Although Turf Wars received many complaints for its War-friendly environment, I believe that game remains popular due to the fact that its constantly active with War. Please Nick, I'm beggin ya, open the door to more War!

  In what ways are you thinking?

  Base acquisition, and hoping are my two main concerns. Nick was a little too conservative when he established the regulations for those two areas.
• ♠♚ЦℕƊƩ₣ᏐℕƩƊ♚♠ Aug 28, 2013

  Mr. Baltimore wrote:

  ♠♚ЦℕƊƩ₣ᏐℕƩƊ♚♠ wrote:

  Mr. Baltimore wrote:

  Although Turf Wars received many complaints for its War-friendly environment, I believe that game remains popular due to the fact that its constantly active with War. Please Nick, I'm beggin ya, open the door to more War!

  In what ways are you thinking?

  Base acquisition, and hoping are my two main concerns. Nick was a little too conservative when he established the regulations for those two areas.

  So you want acquisition to be easier/fewer restrictions on it and for hopping to be easier/go farther?
• The Saw Aug 28, 2013

  I would like to have some sort of chance against a higher agent count. I can't even retaliate today other than sending stupid C4 which just gets me more back in return. Or some kind of real defense even. I'm essentially just a mule with the current setup. This game is worse than Turf Wars in that regard. I wonder when TW 3.0 comes out? I'm guessing when the big spenders really quit dropping the benjamins, World Domination™ will launch and they'll race again.
• Mr. Baltimore Aug 28, 2013

  ♠♚ЦℕƊƩ₣ᏐℕƩƊ♚♠ wrote:

  Mr. Baltimore wrote:

  ♠♚ЦℕƊƩ₣ᏐℕƩƊ♚♠ wrote:

  Mr. Baltimore wrote:

  Although Turf Wars received many complaints for its War-friendly environment, I believe that game remains popular due to the fact that its constantly active with War. Please Nick, I'm beggin ya, open the door to more War!

  In what ways are you thinking?

  Base acquisition, and hoping are my two main concerns. Nick was a little too conservative when he established the regulations for those two areas.

  So you want acquisition to be easier/fewer restrictions on it and for hopping to be easier/go farther?

  Correct. I believe those are the two main factors hindering this game from surpassing Turf Wars in popularity.
• Mr. Baltimore Aug 30, 2013

  The Saw wrote:

  I would like to have some sort of chance against a higher agent count. I can't even retaliate today other than sending stupid C4 which just gets me more back in return. Or some kind of real defense even. I'm essentially just a mule with the current setup. This game is worse than Turf Wars in that regard. I wonder when TW 3.0 comes out? I'm guessing when the big spenders really quit dropping the benjamins, World Domination™ will launch and they'll race again.

  The more we think about it, the more flaws we see in the game. I agree with you!
• 🌟 ℕᎾℛᏆℋ💫ЅᏆᎯℛ 🌟 Sep 2, 2013

  I made a suggestion appointing a solution to this problem in another forum post, but I'll say it again.

  Allow syndicates to target each other and give them combat and defensive bonuses. Same as a vendetta except doesnt expire and there are more players for strategy and the combat advantages won't be as strong as the defensive advantages.

  There you have it.
• ♠♚ЦℕƊƩ₣ᏐℕƩƊ♚♠ Sep 2, 2013

  Qweeter1997 wrote:

  I made a suggestion appointing a solution to this problem in another forum post, but I'll say it again.

  Allow syndicates to target each other and give them combat and defensive bonuses. Same as a vendetta except doesnt expire and there are more players for strategy and the combat advantages won't be as strong as the defensive advantages.

  There you have it.

  Yes